<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/05/2016 16:43, Martin Bless
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:ngsvjv$3m0$2@ger.gmane.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am Tue, 10 May 2016 15:51:24 +0200 schrieb Joschka Tillmanns:
Hello Joschka,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>May I get some feedback for this patch?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I don't like the idea of introducing the dependency of "aspell". For
example I'd like to use "pass" in combination with "Ansible" to set up a
server. But I don't want to have to deal with aspell there.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Aside 1: it could just read /usr/share/dict/words directly, rather
than run "aspell"<br>
<br>
Aside 2: there is a dictionary in rfc2289 appendix D (although I
think these are less memorable)<br>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:ngsvjv$3m0$2@ger.gmane.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Better make generating passphrases a utility of its own.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I agree with this.<br>
</p>
Passphrases are for things that you commit to memory (like your gpg
passphrase); whereas I think the primary role of password-store is
for storing passwords which are hard to remember.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>