<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>It shouldn't be, but will double check... I did generate two new keys, but will check again.</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">--Tiernan<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Jul 2, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <<a href="mailto:jason.donenfeld@gmail.com">jason.donenfeld@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">Is it possible that you're using the same private key for two wireguard devices connecting to the same peer? This misusage could explain the ~0 performance.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 2, 2016 1:13 PM, <<a href="mailto:tiernan@tiernanotoole.net">tiernan@tiernanotoole.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Its not wireguard thats the problem... Only the performance issue is wireguard...<br>
--Tiernan<br>
<br>
Get Outlook for iOS<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:18 PM +0100, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <<a href="mailto:Jason@zx2c4.com">Jason@zx2c4.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
> Just to clarify: does ECMP *without wireguard* work for you on 4.6?<br>
><br>
> In other words, is this a wireguard problem, or a 4.6 problem?<br>
> </blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>