[PATCH] include limits.h instead of linux/limits.h for FreeBSD

Lukas Fleischer cgit at cryptocrack.de
Sat Dec 17 12:24:23 CET 2011


On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:01:23PM -0500, Jamie Couture wrote:
> Likewise.  I too can lend a hand applying / testing submissions.
> I have done so already with a few that apply properly - some patches
> need to be re-submitted.
> 
> I'm not sure if a fork is necessary yet; rather, someone Lars trusts
> to pull changes from.

So, that means that *you* will decide which patches are ready for
mainline inclusion and Lars only merges your branch from time to time?
What's the difference to creating a fork then? Having one maintainer and
several developers that the maintainer pulls from makes sense if there
are loads of patches and/or different subsystems - it allows for sharing
work efficiently. Or if there's a lot of patches that need to be rebased
on each other and you want to assist with doing all the conflict
resolution (which obviously isn't the case here).

If you really want to help, what I'd suggest is:

* Review and test patches. Reply to mails, give feedback and tell
  contributors if there's anything that should probably be fixed. The
  more people review, the better it helps Lars.

* Try to contact Lars and ask him if there's anything else you can do to
  improve his response time. If he doesn't react for another 4 weeks or
  says that he won't be able to spend any time on developing cgit in the
  near future, we should find a new maintainer or start off a fork...

> 
> Also, tags haven't been signed since 0.8.1 (not sure if people care
> about that one).
> 
> On 12/16/2011 08:17 PM, Norberto Lopes wrote:
> >+1
> >
> >I actually have been applying the various patches in the one I build
> >privately. It shouldn't be too hard to just commit them and have them
> >available in github. I would rather not fork though as that would make
> >one of us the decision makers for stuff that sometimes is not really
> >easy to decide on (As an example, I just saw the discussion related to
> >the ABI change for the nonset variable vs empty string). Instead I
> >would gladly give a helping hand to Lars even though I am new around
> >here.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cgit mailing list
> >cgit at hjemli.net
> >http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
> 
> -- 
> Jamie Couture
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cgit mailing list
> cgit at hjemli.net
> http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit




More information about the CGit mailing list