[PATCH 2/2] use correct type for sizeof

[Lars Hjemli]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:38, Jamie Couture <jamie.couture at gmail.com> wrote:
> **L would have worked well too.  Depending on the distribution sizeof *L
> may return 8 instead of 4. **L is preferable, but since we don't expect
> this datatype to change very often, sizeof int is less subtle and easier
> to understand.

Finally applied to stable

--
larsh