[PATCH 2/3] t0107: Skip ZIP tests if unzip(1) isn't available
John Keeping
john at keeping.me.uk
Mon Apr 8 20:49:17 CEST 2013
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:47:14PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:26:32PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:18:19PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> > > Skip tests using unzip(1) if the binary isn't available instead of
> > > erroring out.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <cgit at cryptocrack.de>
> > > ---
> > > tests/t0107-snapshot.sh | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/t0107-snapshot.sh b/tests/t0107-snapshot.sh
> > > index 132d2e9..14ea62d 100755
> > > --- a/tests/t0107-snapshot.sh
> > > +++ b/tests/t0107-snapshot.sh
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,13 @@ run_test 'strip off the header lines (zip)' '
> > > tail -n +6 trash/tmp >trash/master.zip
> > > '
> > >
> > > +unzip=`which unzip`
> > > +test -n "$unzip" || {
> > > + echo "Skipping tests: unzip not found"
> > > + tests_done
> >
> > Is this based on the jk/use-git-test-suite? If so can we use skip_all
> > and test_done instead of tests_done?
> >
> > I have a WIP series that does the global replacements of
> > s/tests_done/test_done/ and s/run_test/test_expect_success/.
>
> It would be great if you could submit that patch and merge into
> jk/use-git-test-suite first, so that we won't get a conflict...
I was hanging onto it to avoid sending lots of incremental patches on
top because I keep thinking of new things to change :-)
But I'll send it out shortly after giving it a quick review.
More information about the CGit
mailing list