[PATCH] t0109: chain operations with &&
john at keeping.me.uk
Thu Apr 11 00:40:48 CEST 2013
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:16:44PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, John Keeping <john at keeping.me.uk> wrote:
> > Without '&&' between operations, we will not detect if strace or cgit
> > exit with an error status, which would cause a false positive test
> > status in this case.
> I wonder if for some of the larger && chains in other tests "set -e"
> would be a bit cleaner. I don't know if setting that inside the test
> string will bubble the setting back up to the test harness (which
> would be bad) or if it would be local for the test (which would be
> ideal). Something to investigate.
I expect if it was that easy, the tests in Git would take an approach
more like that. Personally, I have found in the past that using
"set -e" often leads to problems later on, so I would prefer to keep the
More information about the CGit