Syntax highlighting broken.

[Jason A. Smith]

Maybe there should be another config option, if set would include the
requested additional style sheet in the html, and the css needed by the
script can be included as one possibility.

On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 07:40 +0200, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> We ship highlight in the example script. Without the corresponding css.
> FAIL.
> 
> Why on earth would we want to do that?
> Put the css back!
> 
> On 13/08/13 21:32, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Ferry Huberts <mailings at hupie.com> wrote:
> >> Either do none of it, or do all of it. I vote for all of it.
> >>
> >> Please resurrect the css
> > 
> > Right now we don't ship any highlighting css by default. It's up to
> > the admin on how the css should be integrated, and what highlighting
> > engine is in use. Perhaps different highlighted files will want
> > different css. It may be more efficient to spit out a <link> to a
> > style sheet or the actual styles in <style> from the actual
> > highlighting engine rather than ship them globally on each in every
> > page in the global styles document.
> > 
> 

-- 
/------------------------------------------------------------------\
|  Jason A. Smith                          Email:  smithj4 at bnl.gov |
|  Atlas Computing Facility, Bldg. 510M    Phone: +1-631-344-4226  |
|  Brookhaven National Lab, P.O. Box 5000  Fax:   +1-631-344-7616  |
|  Upton, NY 11973-5000,  U.S.A.                                   |
\------------------------------------------------------------------/