The road to v0.10.1 or v0.11

Jason A. Donenfeld Jason at
Fri Jan 17 18:09:15 CET 2014

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:28 PM, John Keeping <john at> wrote:
>> I really can't see this being sensible without moving to libgit2.  As
>> long as we stick with libgit.a then we need to fork for each request so
>> I'm not sure there's much benefit to supporting FastCGI without moving
>> to something that lets us free resources when we're done processing a
>> request.
> The advantage would be not having to reparse the config and scan for
> repos on every.single.solitary.request.

Oh, and we could avoid a fork() for cached pages...

More information about the CGit mailing list