[pass] Possible improvements

[Dashamir Hoxha]

I see that `pass` is more advanced than what I initially thought.
It allows several people to have access to passwords, and they
all can synchronize through git.

So, replacing asymmetric encryption with symmetric encription
is not an option. However I still think that *both* of them can be
supported,
and the user can choose which one is more suitable for him.
And actually this will not make the script more complicated,
but hopefully simpler.

I have already started to work on it. The first step was to factor out
the encrypt and decript commands:
https://github.com/dashohoxha/password-store/commit/af32b5c8c863a3245b6a3bd752f503f768033361
Please check it out, for code review and to make sure that
I am not missing something.

Thanks,
Dashamir

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Lenz Weber <mail at lenzw.de> wrote:

> Or you use two different keys for a directory.
>
>
> pass init -p subdir keyid1 keyid2
>
> now both people can read it
>
> Am 24.01.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Christoph Egger:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Aleksandr Pasechnik <al at megamicron.net> writes:
> >> How does the key sharing work?
> >
> > You can use a different, shared key for some subdirectories
> > We're doing this a lot here
> >
> >   Christoph
> > _______________________________________________
> > Password-Store mailing list
> > Password-Store at lists.zx2c4.com
> > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Password-Store mailing list
> Password-Store at lists.zx2c4.com
> http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/attachments/20160125/0e311095/attachment.html>