[PATCH] pass generates quite a few errors/warnings with shellcheck

[HacKan]

Sorry I'm sending yet another email, but be careful with tabs/spaces,
you are mixing them in the patch. Many lines are not actually changed
except for the mix, that is not nice.

I'm surprised that shellcheck didn't complain about lines 26, 58, 73,
96, 98, 141 (of the patch, don't know its correspondences with the code).

Other than that, seems ok :)

Cheers!

On 5/18/19 7:18 PM, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> Copy that!
>
> I fixed many (but not all) of the warnings. Two we can't _really_ do anything about (the SC1090s) and two I'm not quite sure how to fix. After my modifications, it passes all the tests, which is a good sign, but there's definitely a chance I misinterpreted something in the code.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Chiraag

-- 
HacKan || Iván
GPG: 0x35710D312FDE468B