[WireGuard] Wireguard behind NAT (Was: Client changes endpoint port, why?)

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

It might be possible to use existing hole punching tricks like STUN
with WireGuard, but there's no way I'm baking something like that into
the kernel protocol itself. This is something neat that might
piggyback on an upper layer.

However, check out the other thread for another more pressing NAT
traversal issue.

Regards,
Jason