[WireGuard] [ANNOUNCE] Snapshot `experimental-0.0.20160708.1` Available

Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to
Fri Jul 8 22:54:51 CEST 2016

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 22:21:09 +0200,
  "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
>> It looks like initially it does 0 length udp packets for keep alive and the
>> authenticated keep alives don't seem to happen until after some data is
>> sent.
>I suspect you forgot to rmmod the previous module before trying this
>branch. There are no 0 length udp packets sent anywhere in this
>branch's code paths.

Yep, that was it. It allowed a remote connection at start up without 
having to manually send traffic out locally first. So it looks like 
it is working as expected.

Right now I am testing through a stateful firewall that blocks the 
inbound connection unless it is related to an already established 
connection. That isn't exactly the same as nat, but should work similarly 
for testing purposes.

More information about the WireGuard mailing list