[WireGuard] heavy packet loss
Jason A. Donenfeld
Jason at zx2c4.com
Fri Nov 4 17:04:29 CET 2016
Hi k,
I'll look into this. Which snapshot are you using? Or, which commit is this?
Jason
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:01 PM, <k at vodka.home.kg> wrote:
> I'm trying to connect 2 endpoints with wireguard.
> One endpoint has MTU of inet inteface 1500, another 1456.
> To prevent packet fragmentation on inet interface i set up mtu 1383 for both wg interfaces. Checked that no frag occurs on inet interface in wireshark. Maximum packet data size is 1383-28 = 1355. Checked with no-fragment ping, packets pass well.
>
> First I checked packet loss between inet IPs
>
> iperf -c x.x.x.x -u -b 25M -l 1400
> 0.0-10.3 sec 29.6 MBytes 24.2 Mbits/sec 16.073 ms 175/23090 (0.76%)
>
> packet loss always within 0.5..1%. its normal
> now I try to do the same with much less bandwidth between wireguard ips
> on packet size <=1252 packet loss rate is 0.5..1%
>
> iperf -c 192.168.254.65 -w 500000 -u -b 1M -l 1252
> 0.0-10.0 sec 1.18 MBytes 991 Kbits/sec 0.659 ms 9/ 1000 (0.9%)
>
> but starting from packet size 1253 packets loss greatly increases. its 6..10%
>
> iperf -c 192.168.254.65 -w 500000 -u -b 1M -l 1253
> 0.0-10.0 sec 1.12 MBytes 936 Kbits/sec 0.328 ms 64/ 998 (6.4%)
>
> Thats why TCP is incredibly slow. If I set up mss for TCP to not exceed packets size threshold TCP is fast.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard at lists.zx2c4.com
> http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list