[WireGuard] AllowedIPs vs. TunnelIPs

Michael Gerlach n3ph at terminal21.de
Sat Oct 1 17:29:29 CEST 2016

We also already done our wireguard deployment via ansible.

From my personal point of view AllowedIPs is completly fine - I do not
see any missunderstanding.. I would prefer to keep AllowedIPs -
especially because our module is done ;)

But yes, it would be good to announce potential option renaming in a
bigger style as people already use configuration deployment - Mind the

best regards,


On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Dan Lüdtke wrote:
> Any news on the AllowedIPs bikeshedding? What have you decided, Jason?
> --> https://www.mail-archive.com/wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com/msg00068.html
> Asking because I am working on an ansible module Would like to use the most recent name for the parameter name.
> - Dan
> PS: Good to see so much progress in the go-wireguard repo, Nathan! Thank you for your effort!
> _______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard at lists.zx2c4.com
> http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Please use PGP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20161001/db776017/attachment.asc>

More information about the WireGuard mailing list