[patch] add support for peer names using a file in userspace

[Eric Light]

For what it's worth, I agree with Lonnie that *something* is necessary.
That said, I don't feel it makes sense in the context of [Peer-
why_would_this_go_here_its_very_strange].
Having it as an attribute of the peer makes sense to me (e.g.
"Description=")... the name really IS an attribute of a peer.
The question is, is wg(8) the right place to put this?  I think so, but
only by virtue of the fact that I can't think of anywhere more
appropriate to put it.
Hope that feedback is worth at least two cents  :)

--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es



On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, at 09:39, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 
> 
> On Dec 8, 2017 14:00, "Lonnie Abelbeck"
> <lists at lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:>> 
>> On Dec 8, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld
>> <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:>> 
>> I suggested "no spaces"  since currently all spaces are stripped in
>> config_read_line()> 
> Oh, okay. It's that way mostly out of my own laziness. I wouldn't
> object to making that into a real parser though.> _________________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard at lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20171209/32edc863/attachment.html>