[ wireguard-dev ] About configuring allowedip
Dan Lüdtke
mail at danrl.com
Fri Feb 24 14:10:45 CET 2017
Nicolas,
I draw your network including the allowed_ips restrictions.
> ping peer3 --peer1--->peer2 : not ok .
This can not work! Peer 2 does not accept the source address from Peer 3. Please review your allowed_ips settings. Draw the things on paper, make PostIt notes representing the packets including their destination address and source address. Draw a little "firewall" on the tunnels (whitelist is allowed_ips, all the rest gets dropped!) and see if the PostIt can make it through with it's source address. Yes, this sounds like child play, but it works. I have taught complex firewalling and VPN setups to lawyers and law makers this way. It helps understanding, if a simple diagram does not cut it.
Allowed IPs is probably the most complex thing WireGuard has to offer from a user perspective. Rename it to Allowed Source Addrresses in your head it becomes clearer.
HTH
Dan
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 11:41, Nicolas Prochazka <nicolas.prochazka at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hello again,
> my configuration ,
> ping peer 1-->peer 2 : ok ( on ipv6 wg0 )
> ping peer 3 --> peer 1 : ok
> ping peer3 --peer1--->peer2 : not ok .
>
>
> On peer 1 , forwarding is setting
> net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding = 1
>
>
> Peer 1 : wg configuration
>
> interface: wg0
> public key: q5ypTBI7bN0vPGzvlGYyF6pCqYgrDsEjO827duAwjX4=
> private key: (hidden)
> listening port: 6081
>
> peer: dOXT9AvlEt9KSl3ricE12GuVa+U4XB0s1c92s8W+9VA=
> endpoint: 52.49.x.x:6081
> allowed ips: ::/0
> latest handshake: 8 seconds ago
> transfer: 71.29 KiB received, 60.28 KiB sent
> persistent keepalive: every 25 seconds
>
> peer: bqwiLTe/hr0JJMz3IvnDXqS5nOT6u/WL75dasmTE/ko=
> endpoint: 10.10.0.69:6081
> allowed ips: fd00::baae:edff:fe72:5094/128
> latest handshake: 45 seconds ago
> transfer: 5.49 KiB received, 6.36 KiB sent
>
>
> Peer 3 :
>
>
> interface: wg0
> public key: bqwiLTe/hr0JJMz3IvnDXqS5nOT6u/WL75dasmTE/ko=
> private key: (hidden)
> listening port: 6081
>
> peer: q5ypTBI7bN0vPGzvlGYyF6pCqYgrDsEjO827duAwjX4=
> endpoint: 10.10.99.230:6081
> allowed ips: ::/0
> latest handshake: 33 seconds ago
> transfer: 4.92 KiB received, 7.55 KiB sent
> persistent keepalive: every 25 seconds
>
>
> Peer 2 :
>
> interface: wg0
> public key: dOXT9AvlEt9KSl3ricE12GuVa+U4XB0s1c92s8W+9VA=
> private key: (hidden)
> listening port: 6081
>
> peer: q5ypTBI7bN0vPGzvlGYyF6pCqYgrDsEjO827duAwjX4=
> endpoint: 77.156.x.x:58943
> allowed ips: fd00::eea8:6bff:fef9:23bc/128
> latest handshake: 1 minute, 43 seconds ago
> transfer: 52.59 KiB received, 79.01 KiB sent
>
>
> 2017-02-23 14:41 GMT+01:00 Dan Lüdtke <mail at danrl.com>:
> Nicolas: Could you provide the configuration files? Because from your little graphic or schema I can not even derive what you are configuring. I guess there is something overlapping prefixes maybe?
>
> Jason: I think we are approaching the point in time when there will be a -dev and a -users ML :)
>
>
> > On 23 Feb 2017, at 14:03, Nicolas Prochazka <nicolas.prochazka at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, i'm trying to do this with wireguard, withtout success :
> >
> > peer1 ---> peer2 : config ok , works
> > peer3 ---> peer1 : config ok , works
> > peer3 --->peer1 ---> peer2 : not ok .
> >
> > I suspect allowed-ip configuration, but all my tests does not works.
> > perhaps I must create two wireguard interface on peer 1 and do forwarding/routing ?
> > i'm using ipv6 as internal ip.
> >
> > so my question is :
> > - two interface ?
> > - specifiq magic allowedip ?
> > ( allowed ip is confusing for, it is using for routing and for evicting paquet ? )
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nicolas
> > _______________________________________________
> > WireGuard mailing list
> > WireGuard at lists.zx2c4.com
> > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
>
>
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list