[ANNOUNCE] WireGuard Snapshot `0.0.20170531` Available

[Le Sandie]

Hi!, iperf results!

Peers: server 10.11.12.1 and client 10.11.12.2

UDP test

100MB transfer (with a size similar to the theoretical raspberry pi fast
ethernet limit (100mbps)


pi at raspberrypi:~ $ iperf -c 10.11.12.2 -u -p 12345 -t 30 -b 100M
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.11.12.2, UDP port 12345
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size:  160 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 10.11.12.3 port 47707 connected with 10.11.12.2 port 12345
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-30.0 sec   278 MBytes  77.8 Mbits/sec
[  3] Sent 198395 datagrams
[  3] Server Report:
[  3]  0.0-30.3 sec  6.30 MBytes  1.75 Mbits/sec  11.417 ms 193896/198393
(98%)
pi at raspberrypi:~ $


WITH the NEW SNAPSHOT (20170531)

pi at raspberrypi:~ $ iperf -c 10.11.12.2 -u -t 30 -b 100M
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.11.12.2, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
UDP buffer size:  160 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 10.11.12.3 port 59246 connected with 10.11.12.2 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-30.0 sec   275 MBytes  77.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] Sent 196350 datagrams
[  3] Server Report:
[  3]  0.0-30.2 sec  6.67 MBytes  1.85 Mbits/sec  10.785 ms 191590/196347
(98%)
[  3]  0.0-30.2 sec  1 datagrams received out-of-order


Results are what i expected, both rpi3 hitting the limit of the fast
ethernet. I'm gonna test it with two routers (Netgear X4S nighthawk, with
ARM neon and Gigabit ethernet interface).

Best!


On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Le Sandie <lesandie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have tested the WireGuard-0.0.20170531 snapshot between two ARM peers
> (a
> > couple of rpi3s with the same snapshot) and it works nice. I haven't had
> > time to iperf but will do to check that performance raise in ARM SoCs.
>
> Great, please do let me know.
>
> >
> > Also i tested this snapshot with one ARM peer and the other peer with a
> LEDE
> > (17.01.1) router with wireguard and the handshake goes well but no
> > connectivity between peers. If i downgrade the ARM peer snapshot to
> > WireGuard-0.0.20170421, both peers see each other with connectivity.
> > Probably when the openwrt/LEDE package maintainer bump up the package to
> the
> > new snapshot it will work.
>
> Yes indeed there was a backwards incompatible change made. The
> openwrt/lede package already has been bumped, however, so just update
> your system.
> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/blob/master/net/wireguard/Makefile
>



-- 
Lt. Col. Sandie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20170605/a3149676/attachment.html>