Git tags

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Jun 16 03:14:29 CEST 2017


On Thu 2017-06-15 18:07:17 -0700, Oliver Beattie wrote:
> I have noticed that when a new snapshot is released, it is tagged in
> the Git repository, and an old tag is typically removed. While I
> understand Wireguard is considered experimental, this is quite
> frustrating as a user of the project.

Huh, i hadn't noticed that older tags had been removed in the canonical
upstream git repo, i agree that's unusual and rather strange.

> Given tags in Git are extremely lightweight, would it be unreasonable
> to keep them around?

The repository where i record debian packaging changes includes a full
copy of the upstream repo (at least as far as what's been packaged) and
that naturally includes the older tags as well:

    https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/wireguard.git/refs/tags

You're always welcome to pull the tags from there (the upstream takgs
should all be cryptographically signed by Jason, so you can verify
authenticity even if the network source is different).

regards,

        --dkg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20170615/1b7af74c/attachment.asc>


More information about the WireGuard mailing list