Roaming Mischief

Bruno Wolff III bruno at
Tue Nov 14 14:25:51 CET 2017

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:59:03 +0100,
  "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at> wrote:
>(!), that would prevent
>servers from roaming; the client would still roam in the eyes of the
>server, but the server, would no longer roam in the eyes of the
>client. In other words, an option -- gasp, a nob! -- to disable
>roaming on a per-by-peer one-sided basis. As you know, I don't really
>like nobs. And I'd hate to add this, and then for people to use it,
>and then loose some nice aspects of roaming, if it's not really even

If you know your other end point is at a fixed address you can use 
iptables (or the equivalent) to enforce this. I don't think it needs 
to be in WireGuard.

More information about the WireGuard mailing list