Policy-based routing

[Bruno]

Hi Jason,

Thanks for your input. I agree with you.

But I could have the peers based on table routing and marking packets, 
were all the traffic (0.0.0.0/0) would be routed based on the prior 
conditions (tables and marking).

I'm doing one interface per peer right now, but I thought it could be 
possible to achieve the same results with just one interface.

Bruno



On 04/13/2018 11:09 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> You can't set multiple peers to use 0.0.0.0/0 at the same time on the
> same interface. How would it be able to choose which peer to send
> traffic to then? Instead, if you want some kind of redundancy or
> bonding, you can try using multiple interfaces, and then use whatever
> traditional routing or load balancing tools that you ordinarily would.
>
> Jason