Channel/Tunnel bonding with wireguard
saeidscorp at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 22 22:03:27 CET 2018
I have been thinking about utilizing WireGuard on my VPS to act as a central
hub for combining my multiple slower connections and having a faster one. I
had a possible way of doing it in my mind, and finally today I did a little bit
of googling found this article (also learned the real name for the technique:
Since this approach uses a user-space daemon to relay around data, it would
incur some performance penalties compared to a kernel-mode driver like WG. So
it's probably not a good idea to use it on top of WG.
The pure WG scheme I have in my mind goes something like this:
- having a single swg0 interface on VPS.
- having multiple interfaces on the client (cwg0, cwg1, ...), each configured
with a single peer, that is the VPS swg0 interface.
- some iptables + ip rules fu to split and re-join the stream of IP packets.
For the third part, I can think of statistic netfilter match for splitting the
packets. But there are other things around which I don't know much about; like
the qdiscs... so I'm not confident if I'm headed in the right direction...
Is this a good idea? What do you suggest? Is there any better way to do it?
Thanks in Advance
More information about the WireGuard