WG interface to ipv4

[logcabin at fastmail.net]

On Tue, May 8, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Riccardo Berto wrote:
> 
> 
> I don't really get why the iface bindings should be accomplished at the 
> WireGuard level. If I get it correctly, it won't be safer than it 
> already is.
> WireGuard just has to provide a secure and standard network interface. 
> There are other full-featured, clogged VPNs out there that can even make 
> you the coffee, I'd like WireGuard to stand out and stick to the 
> original "UNIX tools philosophy": do one thing and do it well.
>
Agree completely. I'd be happy to  see  WG remain as a fast, simple packet-encryption-transmission  engine. 
_______________________________________________
> WireGuard mailing list
> WireGuard at lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard