Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks
John
graysky at archlinux.us
Tue Nov 20 15:23:47 CET 2018
Good call on these ports, Lonnie. I am able use use either 500 or
4500 get WireGuard connectivity on my public WiFis. I also tested
4433 and 1701 (suggested by others in reply to my query) but got a
mixed result with some networks allowing traffic on them and others
not.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:53 PM Lonnie Abelbeck
<lists at lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John <graysky at archlinux.us> wrote:
> >
> > Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my
> > trial-and-error based approach? Wikipedia has an article that lists
> > many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers). Any suggestions are
> > welcomed.
>
> Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T)
>
>
> Lonnie
>
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list