binary module for arch?

[Christian Hesse]

"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at zx2c4.com> on Wed, 2019/01/02 01:22:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 9:50 PM Christian Hesse <mail at eworm.de> wrote:
> >
> > "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason at zx2c4.com> on Mon, 2018/12/31 01:58:  
> > > Hey Christian,
> > >
> > > I noticed there are now two distro-built packages for wireguard for
> > > arch -- wireguard-lts and wireguard-arch. These seem probably more
> > > convenient for most people than the dkms one. What would you recommend
> > > in terms of updating wireguard.com/install/ ? And do you plan on
> > > depreciating the dkms one at some point, or do you think it will
> > > remain useful for certain users?  
> > some people gave their legit reasons to keep wireguard-dkms. I have to add
> > another one: It is a build-dependency for the binary modules packages. So
> > it will stay definitely. ;)  
> 
> Makes sense. I was mostly wondering about that first question though:
> what would you recommend I put on wireguard.com/install/ for Arch
> users?

I sent another mail to the other branch of the thread. Did that answer your
question?
-- 
main(a){char*c=/*    Schoene Gruesse                         */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*    Best regards             my address:    */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/*    Chris            cc -ox -xc - && ./x    */b/42*2-3)*42);}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20190102/13fb941a/attachment.asc>