Allowing space for packet headers in Wintun Tx/Rx
dlenski at gmail.com
Thu Apr 8 17:37:38 UTC 2021
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:10 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 09:42 -0700, Daniel Lenski wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:37 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> > > If we do need a header larger than 4 bytes, then we are forced to do
> > > things properly by adding support in the kernel driver instead of just
> > > abusing the existing header while we know the kernel isn't looking at
> > > it.
> > This is probably too much "inside baseball" for the non-(OpenConnect
> > developers) here, but I *have* confirmed that the PPP-over-DTLS
> > encapsulation is identical to the PPP-over-TLS encapsulation for the 2
> > PPP-based protocols that we support already. Both F5 and Fortinet
> > essentially opted for the thinnest veneer of UDP-ization possible for
> > their protocols.
> Ok, so that's the PPP header plus either 6 bytes for Fortinet or 4
> bytes for F5? The important part for the purpose of this conversation
> is "more than four".
Correct. We need >4 bytes to support PPP-over-DTLS headers without copying.
And we will undoubtedly find more examples in the ongoing quest to
make OpenConnect serve as The One Client For Your Crappy Proprietary
Corporate VPN to Rule Them All.
More information about the WireGuard