wgX iface as slave to a bridge - Linux

[lejeczek]

On 25/04/2021 13:21, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
>> Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved by LInux bridge? I tried
>> but it did not work for me. Similarly "mavclan" -
>> would/should wireguard work that way?
> Why would you want to enslave an L3-only capable interface to an L2 bridge?
>
> What is your use case behind the question?
>
Containers. Simple (but also can be complex too as scales 
easily) case where containers would be glued together and be 
able to communicate across nodes/hosts via wireguard 
tunnel/link.
I'm looking at it from a 'regular' admin standpoint.
Then it'd be just one wiregurard host-to-host link which all 
container could utilize, as oppose to separate wireguard 
for/in each container.

many thanks, L.