UBSAN: object-size-mismatch in wg_xmit
Eric Light
eric at ericlight.com
Fri Jan 8 00:50:36 UTC 2021
@List - I'll reach out to Corey directly and try to help. Sorry for the noise.
E
--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, at 13:44, Corey Costello wrote:
> Yeah, it doesn’t work for me :(
>
> > On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Eric Light <eric at ericlight.com> wrote:
> >
> > Corey - have you tried unsubscribing at the unsubscribe page? https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.zx2c4.com%2fmailman%2foptions%2fwireguard&c=E,1,Axa-ElbX0arA0gS27knqMcMnUXikmpGux0uV7Gv66JniMpXRVVtWNeYE8mu17nQawpfQEodteBfH9tq43ronGkmm07T_Tq9urTmtYLTTK8YwFg,,&typo=1
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > E
> >
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
> > A: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffive.sentenc.es&c=E,1,L28_oBFr0CKAXDsG0BiDkDDhOYaG4FoH7vdeaKoqnsVwn14kiz9J_PpjMZAoItr_wdFvmWS4wAI7qDgBPljT8qxgdAwCA9Vy54M3bcq8nJBKnA11GFTTG6BEv04,&typo=1
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, at 13:34, Corey Costello wrote:
> >> Get me off this fucking list ffs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jan 7, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:23 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These UBSAN checks were just enabled recently.
> >>>>> It's indeed super easy to trigger: 133083 VMs were crashed on this already:
> >>>>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fsyzkaller.appspot.com%2fbug%3fextid%3d8f90d005ab2d22342b6d&c=E,1,RVpgZsRUCGs2jKlumiMAMnpeOF4QdiW5h8GDIsBJPz-orFNwvwCXnceC9n5Bhr1h-G2EsU0tlC7N4QUpHuF6tIMI7tTnBoRjAo5tT-Bk9-Fhe8CppuOL4mqdkA,,&typo=1
> >>>>> So it's one of the top crashers by now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ahh, makes sense. So it is easily reproducible after all.
> >>>>
> >>>> You're still of the opinion that it's a false positive, right? I
> >>>> shouldn't spend more cycles on this?
> >>>
> >>> You might consider making a test build with -fno-lto in case LTO is
> >>> mucking things up.
> >>>
> >>> Google Posts Patches So The Linux Kernel Can Be LTO-Optimized By
> >>> Clang, https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.phoronix.com%2fscan.php%3fpage%3dnews_item%26px%3dLinux-Kernel-Clang-LTO-Patches&c=E,1,7u3-jWadklYo8ai_XrPNvjnu46LLAyg0hqsGIaMPaoQ5UxtcNM84jrHUgSg4VciXKk9XVpwgyBwD85LbbW5_j195jSH6RrAej45I1kr_XfQ,&typo=1
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>
> >>
>
>
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list