Wireguard address binding - how to fix?
Nico Schottelius
nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch
Sun Jun 9 15:39:46 UTC 2024
Jason,
may I shortly ask what your opinion is on the patch and whether there is
a way forward to make wireguard usable on systems with multiple IP
addresses?
Best regards,
Nico
Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch> writes:
> d tbsky <tbskyd at gmail.com> writes:
>> I remembered how exciting when I tested wireguard at 2017. until I
>> asked muti-home question in the list.
>> wiregurad is beautiful,elegant,fast but not easy to get along with.
>> openvpn is not so amazing but it can get the job done.
>
> Nice summary, hits the nail quite well.
>
> Jason, do you mind having a look at the submitted patches for IP address
> binding and comment on them? Or alternatively can you give green light
> for generally moving forward so that a direct inclusion in the Linux
> kernel would be accepted?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nico
-------------- next part --------------
--
Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/attachments/20240609/2f4644e0/attachment.sig>
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list