[RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ui-blame

[Jeffrey Smith]

I am working at rebasing my changes onto git 2.14-rc1 and integrating some
of the suggestions made thus far. Blame is certainly a more expensive
operation, and adding a flag for it makes a lot of sense. I will look into
it further.

 - Jeff

On Aug 4, 2017 7:23 PM, "Daniel Campbell" <dlcampbell at gmx.com> wrote:

> On 07/22/2017 05:02 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:18:06PM -0500, Jeff Smith wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >
> > I have a general question, possible more for any administrators of CGit
> > sites who happen to see this: Should we offer a configuration switch to
> > disable the blame function?  Blame is a comparatively expensive
> > operation compared to everything else we do to display a page, so is
> > there a desire to disable this feature for sites worried about resource
> > usage?
> >
> > [snip]
> >
>
> Hi John,
>
> The option would be great to have, especially for some like me who run
> cgit on a Raspberry Pi or another comparatively weaker device.
> Personally I don't mind it being a little slower in order to use `git
> blame`, but if disabling it improves speed, it seems smart to put it
> behind an option so cgit admins can make the right decision for their
> environments.
>
> ~Daniel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CGit mailing list
> CGit at lists.zx2c4.com
> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/cgit/attachments/20170804/63751552/attachment.html>