[pass] [PATCH] Added 'rename' command

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Matthieu Weber <mweber at free.fr> wrote:
> One thing though: I don't see the need for "pass cp". What is the use
> case where you need a second identical password but with a different
> identifier? Moreover, both passwords would have identical ciphertexts,
> meaning that if you crack password A you get password B for free (if you
> encrypt the same cleartext twice, you get two differnt ciphertexts, but
> in the case of "pass cp" you would obviously have the same ciphertext).

Adding "pass cp" would not make sense for other reasons, which points
to a problem with the current mv implementation: different directories
might have different .gpg-ids, which means those passwords are
expected to be encrypted for different recipients. A proper pass mv
needs to reencrypt. I'll see about fixing this up later today.
Likewise, a "pass cp" would need to do the same, but then it's just
the same as "pass show Old | pass insert -m New"... So in fact,
perhaps a proper implementation of both cp and mv would really just be
the above pipe, or the above pipe plus a removal...