[pass] Possible improvements

[Lucas Hoffmann]

Quoting Matthieu Weber (2016-01-26 16:59:40)
> So symmetric encryption is actally used, and the problem of managing the
> symmetric keys is already solved. What is there not to like about the
> way pass works by default?

I did not mean to say that I do not like the way pass works.  I did mean
to say that I have no reason to like the -c option of GPG to be used in
pass.

And I think I will continue to use my private key with pass, I was just
trying to do some thinking about this proposal.

And I also know that asymmetric encryption with GPG uses symmetric
encryption internally.  But this is a technical detail (and maybe a
security detail), my thought was about the use case and the interaction
the user has to do with pass/gpg/pinentry/gpg-agent.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/attachments/20160126/cd9408d2/attachment.asc>