otp in passmenu

[Kenny Evitt]

I suspect Gildásio used "demand" but meant "request". Nothing else in
their email implies that they're 'demanding' anything from Jason, the
maintainer, or anyone else.



I think it might be reasonable for people to seriously consider
forking Pass. No one's obligated to do anything. But no one's
obligated to refrain from changing Pass, or refrain from sharing those
changes either.

(I'd strongly suggest picking a new distinctive name, or at least a
distinctive variation on "pass" or "password store".)

I suspect Jason considers Pass mostly complete as-is. And that's fine!
I mostly agree with that myself. My own previous patches were never
accepted, and Jason had good reasons for doing so.

But it's frustrating not having patches accepted, or running one's own
custom private 'fork'. If people want to make changes useful to them,
and share those changes with others, then a fork could make sense.
(It's a lot of work tho!)


On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jonas Kalderstam
<jonas at cowboyprogrammer.org> wrote:
>
> On 9 April 2021 04:09:03 CEST, "Gildásio Júnior" <gildasiojunior at riseup.net> wrote:
> >I have the same demand as Alessandro Accardo mentioned in Sep 2018 [0].
> >He submited a patch, receive a feedback, updated it and I couldn't see
> >any other new feedback.
>
> I wouldn't expect much in terms of a reply when you have "demands" on people working for free in their spare time..
>
> >PS: I didn't have experience contribut with git patches by email. So
> >please let me know if I did something wrong and how can get the right
> >path.
>
> See https://git-send-email.io for an excellent guide to git and email.
>
>