WG via systemd (dis)advantage?
vtol at gmx.net
Wed May 2 18:48:32 CEST 2018
Debian kernel 4.15.11
Out of curiosity having WG configured/manged via systemd, which is
working thus far as having the interface up and listening (also after
rebooting the server).
Now I was looking to manipulate the network interface with some
post-up/post-down which though does not seems applicable with systemd,
like it would be when managed through networking.service.
Hence, wondering whether I miss something about systemd or whether it is
rather a bit of a disadvantage to configure/manage WG through systemd as
opposed to networking.service?
What is the benefit of systemd vs. networking.service WG management?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4174 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the WireGuard