WG interface to ipv4
vtol at gmx.net
Sat May 5 19:53:37 CEST 2018
I am not asking to castrate WG in any way and suppose you are referring
likely to WG clients when citing a roaming scenario, at least my servers
are not roaming.
And on a server I prefer tight control over what is happening with the
network. Hence, it would be good to have an option (enhancing WG) in the
- choose ip protocol version - ipv4 or or ipv6 or both
- bind WG to either iface(s) or subnet(s)
I trust that such is available and common practice with other VPN apps.
> If wg was binding to a particular interface, I don't think it would be
> possible to support roaming scenarios. I have a travel wifi router,
> and I love the fact that it will automatically switch between
> connecting through the Ethernet interface or the USB tethering one.
> The need you describe is orthogonal to the role of wireguard. If you
> want to tightly control what wireguard is doing, you should use 1)
> good routing rules and 2) iptables to match these rules.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4174 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the WireGuard