Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks

Lonnie Abelbeck lists at lonnie.abelbeck.com
Mon Nov 19 21:53:53 CET 2018


> On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John <graysky at archlinux.us> wrote:
> 
> Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my
> trial-and-error based approach?  Wikipedia has an article that lists
> many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers).  Any suggestions are
> welcomed.

Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T)


Lonnie



More information about the WireGuard mailing list