Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks
Lonnie Abelbeck
lists at lonnie.abelbeck.com
Mon Nov 19 21:53:53 CET 2018
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John <graysky at archlinux.us> wrote:
>
> Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my
> trial-and-error based approach? Wikipedia has an article that lists
> many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers). Any suggestions are
> welcomed.
Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T)
Lonnie
More information about the WireGuard
mailing list