Using WireGuard on Windows as non-admin - proper solution?

[Riccardo Paolo Bestetti]

On Wed Nov 25, 2020 at 6:57 PM CET, Clint Dovholuk wrote:
> Out of curiosity - why not just use " S-1-5-4" Interactive - " A group
> that
> includes all users that have logged on interactively. Membership is
> controlled by the operating system."
>
> If the user logged on - let the turn the tunnel on/off?
Isn't this akin to having no permissions at all?

Furthermore, I think the point of this feature is to give more
fine-grained control to IT admins. Which it accomplishes, without
introducing much complexity. Piece of beauty!

Riccardo